Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts

Friday, May 14, 2010

The $25 Bill. A Good Idea Whose Time Has Come

U.S. CURRENCY/EDITORIAL

I used to run a business and as a joke my office wall featured a little plaque that read, “If it makes sense-it’s against company policy!” About a month ago I was sorting out my pocket change and stopped to frown at the pennies, nickels, dimes and quarters for a moment. Then I glanced at a pile of currency comprised of ones, fives, tens and twenties. It was then that I wondered why the United States produces a twenty-five cent coin but only a twenty-dollar bill.

Wouldn’t it make more sense for the Bureau of Engraving and Printing to produce a twenty-five dollar bill? Using this method it would only take four “twenty-fives” to make one hundred-dollars instead of five twenties. For every four twenty-five dollar notes produced by the B.E.P. the country would save the expenditure of making one twenty; effectively saving the nation 20% in the production costs involved. The “twenty” is one of the most utilized forms of currency today, however the note has a shelf life due to wear and tear of only around two years at best. Most people don’t know that the Federal Reserve destroys 7,000 tons of no longer usable currency a year. With that kind of turnover, finding an excuse not to print one out of every five only makes sense to me.

On that note, (sorry for the pun) I would like to propose to the powers that be my own idea of what the “twenty-five” might look like.

There couldn’t possibly be that much controversy (especially among Native Americans remembering the "Trail of Tears") regarding retiring Andrew Jackson from U.S. paper currency; could there? Though I’ve done some extensive research on the subject, I’ve yet to determine what exactly motivated someone to propose his portrait to replace Grover Cleveland’s in 1928 in the first place. After all, this is the same Andrew Jackson who in his farewell speech to the nation stressed his opinions against paper money and in fact made it one of the goals of his administration to put the National Bank/the Bank of the United States/Federal Bank out of business.

Rather than go through congressional hearings and politicos’ ranting all over the radio waves for the next decade over who to replace him with, in the name of expediency and for the sake of argument, I chose to put someone who is already approved and appears on the fifty-cent coin; namely President John F. Kennedy. This would cause a stir in some quarters, but the man did after all have his life taken from him during his service to his country, was a war hero, saved the nation from nuclear annihilation during the Cuban Missile Crisis, and did more than any other to get America into space and onto the moon. In my view that is reason enough.

The note is patterned after the soon to be distributed $100 bill, incorporating some of its new features and adding some of my own. There are the obvious security measures of an ultra-violet strip embedded in the paper (in this case it glows purple,) the red, white and blue fibers within the surface, the large sight-impaired color shifting denomination in the lower right corner of the bill along with the portrait watermark. In addition to those, I substituted the inkwell with a statue of liberty that changes color when the bill is tilted from copper to green, and I moved the 3D hologram strip from the center to the far left border.

The new pale blue 3D hologram stripe contains a white “TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS” that moves side-to-side and up and down to indicate at even a casual glance if the bill is genuine or not. The MDCCLXXVI (1776) to the left of Kennedy’s portrait appears and vanishes, and the S at the end of the “TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS” in the upper right border changes back and forth to a $. Since each denomination has its own color scheme I incorporated a yellow hue in the middle of the bill that is hard for a home scanner to detect and that a printer would read as white.

My own personal touch was to add a “dollar sign” in front of the denomination in the upper right corner, if only because the noble symbol has been absent from our currency for some time now. In the future I’d like to see the “paper” replaced with something more durable like the polymer notes produced in Australia since 1988 that are harder to duplicate and last longer.

Please recommend this article to others by clicking this icon >>>

This article was first pubilshed at BlogCritics.org
WARNING: Reproduction of the FIRST PARAGRAPH of this article is permitted as long as a link to it is provided. Reproduction of this article past the first paragraph is forbidden without the author's permission ©-2010 by Jet Gardner/Blogcritics.org


https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCx2zQ89aiUJbGM5kJhRQqQcDX_XoArBFyDiKvoLfjaOzOMjk8pYeQFXW0V3JoJBi7XQSHSkffSGCmO6ptPur4GbqItW7Zz3gtWBnAPhCSL0TBWOTDSJr8Hvn19VI6LW5m5jJMu6qAMGo/s1600-r/September+Store+Title.JPG

Saturday, September 19, 2009

CNN To Fox News-“YOU LIE!”-Demands Apology

CNN’s Rick Sanchez became livid on his program Friday about a color ad that Fox News had placed in the September 17, 2009 edition of The Washington Post.

The ad contained a photo, which he said is suspiciously similar to a tower shot used by CNN of the Tea Party March on Washington D.C. The offending ad accused all of the major networks by name, including CNN, of intentionally not covering the event, and implying that only Fox covers “all” the news and no one else does. The event was referred to as a right-wing tea party and was heavily promoted and covered at Fox News.

Sanchez said Fox was “…using a lie to try and divide people into camps. And, you know, Americans are starting to get tired of this.”

Sanchez went on to use several methods to prove just how well the event was covered by CNN, showing a clip of the Fox News Bill O’Reilly program “The O’Reilly Factor” in which Bill says on camera, “…CNN, as we mentioned, covered the anti-Obama protests, of course…”

As further proof he ran several clips of CNN correspondents reporting on the event. CNN’s Paul Steinhauser reported on the route the protesters were taking and the approximate time the event would take place on the west front of the Capital building. CNN correspondent Kate Bolduan reported on traffic conditions for the rally, helpfully mentioning that many were still stuck on Pennsylvania Avenue and that crowds were still coming from Freedom Plaza. CNN’s Lisa Desjardins interviewed protesters in the crowd indicating that they all very strongly supported Congressman Joe Wilson’s outburst at President Obama.

Saving the best for last Sanchez played coast-to-coast clips of CNN correspondent Jim Spellman who had traveled with the “Tea Party Express” to some 30 rallies reporting on them in several news casts as they traveled east to Washington D.C. Spellman reported of the growing numbers within the protesters who loudly support, “…outlandish conspiracy theories about death camps about this takeover, people comparing President Obama to Hitler. And it really is a sizable thread. It's not just a couple of people on the edges.”

One protester was so proud of his stand that when he realized he was on camera, he actually turned his sign around so that it couldn't be read by viewers!

As Sanchez’s anger grew at the out-and-out lie that CNN didn’t cover the event he said this of the photo in their ad, “All right, let me show you this. You see the thing on the left now? That's our tower cam shot of the event that we used repeatedly throughout those shows. Funny how you can say that we didn't cover an event by using that picture, that picture that looks an awful lot like our tower cam shot, doesn't it? And you used it in your ad saying we didn't cover the story.”

Sanchez summed up his presentation by saying that the difference in the two competing network’s coverage of the event was that CNN “covered” it while Fox News went out of their way to “promote” it in order to divide the country along political lines and defied Fox to study the different meanings of those two words. He went on to reiterate that CNN covered the event with four correspondents, two satellite trucks, multiple live interviews with attendees, and on-camera lawmakers giving their views.

CNN put in a call to Fox News asking for a comment on Sanchez’s report, and informing them of Rick's on-camera demand of an apology for the false and misleading ad.

Apparently they’re still waiting for someone to return that call.

Sanchez ended his segment by saying,
“Let me address the FOX News Network now perhaps the most current way that I can, by quoting somebody who recently used a very pithy phrase, two words. It's all I need: You lie."


If you'd like to watch the actual news segment click here.



WARNING: Reproduction of this article is forbidden without the author's permission
©-2009 by Jet Gardner/Blogcritics.org

Sunday, November 16, 2008

Editorial: The U. S. in Crisis-Either Join Together or Fall Apart

This editorial contains strong language-and for a damned good reason...


Look what we've done to ourselves!!! YOU-YES-YOU LOOK AT US AND WHAT WE'RE DOING!!!


LOOK WHAT WE DID TO THE FIRST PRESIDENT BUSH!
We all rallyed behind him during the first gulf war, Hell-half of us wanted to erect a statue to the man in front of the capital (myself included) but half of us wanted badly to see him fail in revenge for how the ultra right-wing "christian conservatives" kidnapped the republican party and held it for ransom!!!

It was during this period that I switched from a liberal Republican to a conservative democrat.

We never gave President Bush I a chance in 1988. But stop and look at the work he's done since leaving office for world disaster relief etc, and wonder what he could've done as president-had we only given him a chance!


LOOK WHAT WE DID TO BILL CLINTON
The moment he took office the right-wing tried to find any way they could to bring him down whether he deserved it or not.
Bitch and CLAIM all you want, but in the end it comes down to you refusing to cooperate and rally around him to make this country great, much less get behind a man who like it or not brought down our deficit and presided over one of the most peaceful and prosperous times in American History!!! Remember we're not talking budget deficit-we're talking SURPLUS!

AND FOR WHAT???

Despite dragging him into impeachment, the only trumped up charge you could make stick was lying to his wife and the American people about getting a fucking blow job-a god damned BLOW JOB-something any husband would lie about in the same circumstances.

You can beat your partisan chests till your blue in the face and CLAIM he was guilty of anything you want, BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT YOU WANT TO BELIEVE, but in the end a REPUBLICAN congress did not have enough on him to bring him down (despite "Whitewater" and he remained in office... despite what "facts" you sore losers will regurgitate up


LOOK WHAT WE DID TO GEORGE W. BUSH.
Hell after 9/11 we were all ready to put the man on Mt. Rushmore!!! I was so pumped up with patriotic lust, I flew a giant flag from my penthouse balcony for months afterward.

But when the chips started to go south, rather than rally around the man-OUR president-OUR country, we all got together and nearly shoved him over a political cliff-and for what?

Partisan bickering and posturing.

George Bush may go down in history as one of the most ineffective, reviled and embarrassing presidents of the United States, because half the country prayed for him to fail the moment he took office in revenge for what the Republicans did to Bill Clinton!

And look at us now.
JUST LOOK AT US! Is it any wonder the United States has lost nearly all respect we've ever had worldwide?


Have any of you pompous asses ever met, much less gotten to know Barack Obama? No-well I haven't either, and yet you have the arrogance and nerve to judge the man, based on only your own sources of information (selected to confirm anything you want to say about the man), which may or may not (emphasis on not) be reliable.

Considering the enormous job the man is facing, you'd think you'd at least give him the benefit of the doubt; but no.

You WANT him to fail-EVEN IF IT MEANS WATCHING OUR COUNTRY GO BANKRUPT; would it really be worth it to see Obama fail?... because you know that's the only way your opposition parties will win the next elections.

Hell, I'm ashamed to say that there are parts of our country that want to see him assassinated because they don't want some nigger in the whitehouse... now that's something to fill you with national pride isn't it? Bus loads of kids in Idaho chanting "Kill Obama!"

It's time for us to pull ourselves up by our goddamned jockstraps and turn this country around-not later-now!!!!

Worry about the damned elections in four years, not January 21st 2009 and help Obama pull this country back together before it's too late.


WARNING: Reproduction of this article is forbidden
without the author's permission
© 2008 by Jet in Columbus

Friday, September 12, 2008

Is The News Media Guilty of Intentionally Manipulating Recent Elections?

I’m going to ask you to do something very difficult and put your opinions of the candidates away for a moment and look at this election from another angle. I think I've got it figured out now, it's not pretty, and I hope I’m wrong.

When the network and cable news see either one or the other candidate gaining a sizable lead, they seem to concentrate on the underdog until his poll numbers are as close to equal with his opponent's.

It’s obvious (to me anyway) that news organizations need viewer numbers; ad revenue, it's the name of the game. After all, who's going to watch every developing news flash if McCain or Obama were so far ahead, that the election was a foregone conclusion? I’m beginning to suspect that the heads of those news and print media organizations go out of their way to do everything possible in the tone of their reporting to make sure the candidates are as "separated at birth" as they possibly can get them. That means right up to the day of the election the TV and print media absolutely need as much suspense as they can create. It sells magazines and newspapers, and awards top ratings that add up to big ad revenue bucks.

Last year Senator Hillary Clinton had what for all intents and purposes was a lock on the Democratic nomination. She even had more votes than Obama, so by how much and how did she lose the nomination? Was it only my perception that the news media suddenly hung on every word out of Sen. Obama’s mouth to the point of practically ignoring her… and McCain for that matter?

Last year, it looked like Rudy Giuliani had a lock on the Republican nomination, but what happened-the press concentrated on every fault or scandal in his history, to give the other candidates-mainly McCain-a chance to catch up to him... by the way McCain was nearly dead in the water a year ago, but suddenly he’s the “comeback kid.”

If I’m right, it might explain why suddenly this country has a lot of razor-sharp margins in the Senate, the House and the last two presidential races, (to the point that the Supreme Court had to decide the 2000 presidential election,) and why the current one is so close when it didn’t used be perceived that way.

Obama needed Clinton in the Vice President slot to energize his chances of winning. McCain need Giuliani for the same reason, but look who they picked for running mates instead? I'm an undecided democrat. I really don't like Obama for the reasons I’ve stated in an another article, and I can't stand Governor Sarah “Church Lady” Palin-I cringe every time I think of her probably becoming president two years after the election and I wonder if she was separated from birth from Karen Walker of “Will and Grace”.

Of one thing I'm absolutely sure... and I hate it.

I'll be voting against someone, instead of for someone this year... damnit


WARNING: Reproduction of this article is forbidden
without the author's permission
© 2008 by Jet in Columbus

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

Politics, God, Fear, Bigotry and the Money Changers at the Temple

While most people speak of Christianity in a "Faith" light, or a"family values" light, I'm beginning to suspect that most are missing something that I'm just now starting to see.

The two heads of the "religion" dragon that aren't often mentioned are "Fear" and "Money."

Fear
Those who are powerless often employ God's name. They are convinced that if they evoke God often enough and loud enough, the peasants they're trying to control or manipulate will "fear him as you fear me." The "what if" factor plays a very important part of their lives... (What if God really is speaking through them, or worse yet what if God judges me for defying him, even if the almighty is not using that human as a "speaker phone from heaven?"

I lost my fear of God as a teenager when I heard the original album "Jesus Christ Superstar"-Not the soundtrack to the movie; the real thing original record album before it became a broadway play.

Over my years I thought that nothing could ever change the love I felt for Christ

...but I was wrong.

You see Jesus left me alone down here with ordinary humans. As more and more of them preached hate in his name, instead of love, they wore down and skewed my love of God and tried to turn it into fear instead.

When I'm alone with several of these "born-agains" I like to (excuse the expression) "scare the hell out of them" by looking up at the sky, shaking my fist upward and screaming at the top of my lungs for God to strike me down for defying "his" teaching. Terror usually grips them as they back away.

Usually afterward they say they were afraid I'd lost my mind and might hurt them, but the truth is they back away for fear-their fear-that God's wrath may strike them down with me.

Apparently God's aim isn't so good in his old age according to them. To stand next to me would be to fear that they haven't made it safely to the other shoreline before God drops the Red Sea on me.

My God is one of love, of gentle teaching, and of transformation-not one of hate and most of all Fear.

Admit it-Most people fear God like a hated employer who is constantly lurking in the shadows somewhere waiting to overhear something he can punnish you for saying.

We humans fear what we don't understand...
We humans tend to kill what we fear.

I do not, nor have I ever feared the almighty GOD and I've never been afraid to print out his awsome name anywhere. I don't fear judgement from my god... I fear only man's.

Far too many ignorant people see God as some sadistic monster with a whip, waiting just beyond earth's bounds laughing with St. Peter at the pearly gates, with his book of sins to punish you.

Money...
the one thing the TV preachers worship above and before God

Then there's the money changer priests at the steps of the temple. People who see a congregation not as a group of people joined in faith-no they are a group of people joined in fear that their spiritual leader will abandon them to god's wrath unless they tithe their earnings to him.

They disgust me because they live by the saying "You get what you pay for" instead of anything they might selectively read in the Bible to justify their hate, or sins committed against others in "his" name.

I've learned the hard way that the Phelp's, the Anita Bryants and the Jerry Falwells of this world are very replaceable. One goes, and another immediately takes their place-hands extended with a collection plate instead of a bible.

I glory in God's word, not fear it.

I dare presume to pity those who fear their preachers and I'll tell you why. My faith has been truly shaken in the last few years. Sometimes I think Job would blanche at my story.

But my faith is still with me... shaken and stirred severely yes, but it's still there.


WARNING: Reproduction of this article is forbidden without the author's permission
© 2008 by Jet in Columbus

Thursday, December 7, 2006

President Gerald Ford Was One of Us

I am grieving as if one of my own family members had died. Gerald R. Ford was my personal political hero, and I believe that history will judge him better than he was ever given credit for. If a Hollywood movie were to be made of his life in the 1970s no one would have believed it.

How could this man Gerald R. Ford Jr. ever become President of the United States on purpose? Gerald Ford wasn’t even his real name! He was born in Omaha Nebraska in 1913 as Leslie Lynch King Jr. He was the son of divorced parents. Businessman Gerald R. Ford in Grand Rapids Michigan adopted him after marrying his mother. Everyone knew him, as a straight shooter and honest young man who spoke what he thought blemishes and all, looked you in the eye when he talked and always told the unvarnished truth. He married a divorced woman named Betty Warren in 1948.

Many of his friends considered him too honest of a man to run a local school board, much less become President of the United States!

So how did he do it? He was simply one of us and went out and earned it.

The “accidental president” up until fate had called him was never more than a Congressman from Michigan. Ford wasn’t a man who came from money, he fought and clawed his way through his life. He parlayed a stellar high school football performance into a full athletic scholarship at the University of Michigan. Not only was he a great player who was the center on a Big Ten varsity team, he had a brain to match his brawn, majoring in economics. A twist of fate must’ve kept him from turning down pro offers from the Green Bay Packers and the Detroit Lions.

Instead he moved toward academics at Yale where he studied law while coaching boxing and football. He graduated Yale Law School near the top of his class, but another twist of fate diverted him; the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941. He gave up a promising fledgling law practice to sign up with the Navy and he served four years in World War II.

With his hitch up in the military, he returned to law but was bitten by the political bug and decided to try multi-tasking by marrying a pretty divorcé named Betty whom he adored, and at the same time defeating a local G.O.P. Representative.

For 25 years, Ford was your above average politician, depending on his quiet dependability and love of his career and country to keep him in office. In 1964 he was elected the House Minority Leader and became known for butting heads with President Lyndon B. Johnson at every opportunity. Later Johnson would be quoted joking in frustration that Ford must have played his entire football career without a helmet. Ford was present when the 25th amendment to the Constitution was ratified. Little did he know he’d be its first test case?

One of Ford’s biggest frustrations in his congressional career was that the Republicans were never in a congressional majority, which meant he couldn’t get important things done without the title of House Speaker. Fate took his hand again when Spiro Agnew resigned as Vice President and Richard Nixon wisely made a politically savvy and safe choice that he was sure that Congress couldn’t possibly oppose. At the time, Ford was seriously considering retirement from politics but jokingly told his friends that becoming vice president might be a nicer way to round out his career.

Gerald Ford became the first man ever to hold the office of Vice President without being elected to the job.

As The Watergate scandal wroght political havoc on the United States, the Cold War with the U.S.S.R. was heating up. In 1973 OPEC dropped a political bomb on the nation by creating the artificial Oil Crisis. Little did newly appointed Vice President Ford know it, but fate was about to take his hand again.

On October 8th Richard M. Nixon became the first man ever to resign the office of President of the United States. Gerald Ford stepped in with little preparation the very next day and became the first man to hold office as President without ever being elected by the people.

It seemed as if all Hell began breaking loose. The Soviet Union supported an Arab attack on Israel. The Vietnam War was a decade-old disaster with seemingly no end in sight as Nixon was too distracted with his own scandals to manage the military withdrawal from Southeast Asia. The American public was turning swiftly against its own government as repeated political revelations compounded political scandals that rocked the nation.

In the midst of all this chaos with little preparation for taking the reigns of State stood an unlikely superhero with a Midwestern accent and a giant “D” for “Dependable!” scrawled in magic marker across his chest. It seemed that the only way out of the mess and to start over was to effectively commit political suicide for the good of the country. Unhesitatingly, he pardoned Richard Nixon. It’s my personal belief that had he not taken that brave step, he could have been known as one of this nation’s greatest presidents and been reelected twice more. He made the politically stupid mistake of putting the nation before himself instead.

And that’s why he’s my hero.

In the aftermath all Hell really did break loose. The well-liked “everyman” was now a scheming political crony who must’ve made a deal with Nixon to become President in return for that pardon. While the shutdown of the Watergate trials brought the long political nightmare for the nation to and end, his own was only beginning.

For many in this nation, the pardoning of Nixon will never be forgiven. So many people can’t see past an honest and brave act to save a nation in turmoil from self destruction. Few will give him credit for what he really accomplished. If he hadn’t acted the country would’ve been mired down for decades. Ford’s approval ratings plummeted from 71% to 49%.

Every hero has a heroine that adored him and that was Betty. She turned the Presidential Mansion into a messy suburban house, taking down artwork and putting up family photos. She appalled Washington insiders by becoming an everyday housewife, often chairing private family dinners in curlers. The public noticed and thanks to her the American People began warming to the Fords again. She even did a hilarious guest appearance on the Mary Tyler Moore show, trying to convince a skeptical Mary over the phone that it really was the first lady on the other end of the line.

The president was joyfully unashamed of public shows of affection, often holding hands, laughing, hugging and kissing her in front of cameras, looking more like two highschoolers on a date instead of heads of State.

Through all his accomplishments, President Gerald Ford could very well be remembered for endearing himself as the everyman to the American people. There were assassination attempts, slapstick tumbles down stairs, and he even beaned a bystander with a golf ball while making a tee shot at a charity event. Bob Hope once famously quipped that it was easy to find President Ford on a golf course, just follow the wounded!

If only they had had a little more time in office. He’d resolved to not run for another term as President, but was later convinced that he still had things to do. His failure to be elected could be attributed mostly to his move toward the political center, thus causing the Republican right-wing ultraconservatives to abandon him in the shadow of Roe v Wade. In the end he lost the election by only 56 electoral votes. I gladly handed out bumper stickers and leaflets for his campaign on street corners.

Four years later Ronald Reagan even considered offering him the spot of Vice President on his winning 1980 Republican ticket, but the political right convinced him that Ford had too much baggage.

My heartfelt condolences go out to Betty and the whole Ford family, along with a grateful nation. One of our own died today and we’ll miss him terribly.
Please recommend this article to others by clicking this icon >>>



WARNING: Reproduction of the FIRST PARAGRAPH of this article is permitted as long as a link to it is provided. Reproduction of this article past the first paragraph is forbidden without the author's permission
©-2010 by Jet Gardner/Blogcritics.org

Saturday, April 8, 2006

Have I become a bigot regarding "Fundamentalists"

Just like the word "Liberal," the word "Fundamentalist" seems to have taken on a new meaning.

Why is that?
Fundamentalist gangs in Afghanistan are beating women on the street just for showing any part of their hair or even an ankle.
Does this sound reasonable?

Why is it that the words "Jewish", "Muslim", "Christian", and "Islamic" seem to always precede the word "Fundamentalist," and a description of an act of extreme hatred or prejudice follows it? Fundamentalism is the reason that in the middle-east right now, children are being taught from birth that their only reason for existing is to kill Jews, and in order to get into heaven, they must suicidally blow themselves up, taking as many souls with them as they can!

Remember when Afghan Fundamentalists dynamited giant Buddhist statues, all centuries-old and irreplaceable monuments to a culture, just because they didn't agree with their religion?

Could we be heading towards having Christian Fundamentalist groups cruising the streets and fining public buildings for not having Christmas decorations up or crucifixes over their door? Could a bill hit Congress banning the word "holiday," replacing it with "Christian" or "Christmas"? Happy holidays! As if pretty lights, Santa Claus, and chopped-down pine trees have anything to do with the birth of Christ or why we still revere him over 2000 years later.

Could a bill be heading to Congress this minute to destroy any faces on Mt. Rushmore that even vaguely represented the Democratic Party's point of view because the Congress is Republican? Don't laugh; and before you think I'm just being paranoid, there are bills that have been introduced repeatedly encouraging replacing Democrats on our currency with Ronald Reagan on the $10 bill and/or the dime. Even our national airport was renamed after him. Will a huge battle result in Congress, after the Democrats take it back, over whether to have Reagan's name taken back off the building again?

Could someone actually take Kennedy's name off of the airport? Don't laugh-don't scoff; Cape Canaveral the city in Florica with all the launch pads, used to be known as Cape Kennedy, but the name was changed because of a twist in the opposite political direction!

Is it me?

I'm beginning to feel as if, oh I don't know, that if someone feels powerless in their life, if they have no respect, or no one loves them, then all they'd have to do is evoke the name of God, or wave the Bible around, memorize the Constitution or the Torah enough to quote it, and convince a few people that they just might speak for God, George Washington, Allah, or Mohamed, or better yet, that he's speaking through them, and suddenly they feel power because everyone else gets the "what if" syndrome. What if he actually is speaking for God, and even if he isn't, would St. Peter judge me at the gates for not believing him?

When you use God, suddenly people fear you, as if cursing you is cursing God. The fundamentalists have somehow also made the words "Christian", "Flag," and "American" to mean the same thing. It's like their new "holy trinity," as though you can't believe in one unless you believe in all three; and if you don't, they might convincingly brand you a heathen, a traitor, or worse: a Liberal. The opposite is true too; if you see a Flag bumper sticker, or the whole back window of a pick up truck taken up with a flag graphic, do you say, "There goes a Democrat?" No, the republicans have taken ownership of our national banner!

When did this happen?
Why did this happen?

People like the late Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson raise untold, untaxed millions and billions a year. They say it's to help the hungry little children in some far-flung country, but when you see their lavish homes, the huge university campuses that they command, and the elaborate church grounds with dozens of ornate buildings, you know without a doubt where the money came from for that, don't you?

And yet everyone keeps sending it!

You're also buying politicians whose only qualifications are that they're up for sale! But by giving it to the Falwells of this world, you're giving them the power, not you. No one in Congress knows what anyone stands for any more, because they stand for whoever contributed the most to their campaign, their sponsors, instead of their own or our views! Members of Congress don't represent their constituents any more; they represent their financial sponsors!

I miss a time when being on the "Left" or being on the "Right" was respected as an opinion, as a party affiliation, from people who respected a different point of view as much as their own.

Why are the days gone, and I remember them well, when a President got elected and suddenly the rancor disappeared; everyone shook hands and we all stood behind him united as a country because "we the people" elected him. Now, we're all bad losers. If we didn't vote for him, we immediately plan to do our damnedest to bring him down or discredit him. We're so divided now, no longer "indivisible, with liberty and justice for all" any more. Just look at the popular election vote results for 2000 and 2004 for proof of how much this country is divided, with liberty and justice now being the possession only of those who can afford to buy it.

Any more, when I see the word "Fundamentalist," an article follows on war, oppression, hatred, or judgment. It has happened in each generation, and will happen again. Our culture today is being fed by the self-righteous fundamentalist community whereby someone has to be hated in the name of "morality" in order to make people agree with their radical ideas. To be one, means they are right and everyone else is wrong.

Is this the only way to unite a nation; to find someone to hate as a collective group, so we can claim something in common?

Why?

Did voting this or that way keep us out of war?
Did voting this or that way prevent 9/11?
Did voting this or that way make our economy go from great news to great deficits?

I'll leave you to your own conclusions...



WARNING: Reproduction of this article is forbidden
without the author's permission
© 2006 by Jet in Columbus

This article is sponsored by...